Bismuth Subcarbonate as Filler Particle for an Epoxy based Root Canal Sealer
Schwartzer, Eduardo; Genari, Bruna; Leitune, Vicente C. B.; Collares, Fabrício M.; Samuel, Susana M. W.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/polimeros.2014.010
Polímeros: Ciência e Tecnologia, vol.23, n6, p.743-747, 2013
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the addition of bismuth subcarbonate with different concentrations regarding the rheological properties of an experimental epoxy-based root canal sealer. Materials and Methods: Endodontic sealers were prepared with epoxy resin-based sealer with bismuth subcarbonate additions of 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%, and 120%. Flow, film thickness, working time, setting time, dimensional change, sorption, solubility, and cytotoxicity were studied according to the ISO standards. Data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA, and Tukey multiple comparisons were used, with a significance level of 5%. Results: The flow, working time, water sorption, and solubility significantly decreased and the film thickness and dimensional change increased with higher filler particle addition. There were no statistically significant differences for setting time and cytotoxicity between the filler particle proportions. Conclusion: Experimental resin-based sealer with bismuth subcarbonate addition up to 40% can be an alternative for root canal sealer.
Keywords
Bismuth subcarbonate, epoxy-based endodontic sealer, filler particle
References
1. Schilder, H. – J. Endod., 32, p.281 (2006). PMid:16554195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.02.007
2. Bernardes, R. A.; De Amorim Campelo, A.; Silva Junior, D. S.; Pereira, L. O.; Duarte, M. A.; Moraes, I. G. & Bramante, C. M. - Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 109, p.e47 (2010). PMid:20123369. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.038
3. Silva, E. J. N. L.; Rosa, T. P.; Herrera, D. R.; Jacinto, R. C.; Gomes, B. P. F. A. & Zaia, A. A. - J. Endod., 39, p.247 (2013).
4. Marín-Bauza, G. A.; Silva-Sousa, Y. T. C.; Cunha, S. A.; Rached-Junior, F. J. A.; Bonetti-Filho, I.; Sousa-Neto, M. D. & Miranda, C. E. S. - J. Appl. Oral Sci., 20, p.455 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000400011
5. Da Conceição, B. M.; Visconte, L. L. Y. & Furtado, C. R. G. - Polímeros, 22, p.352 (2012).
6. Collares, F. M.; Leitune, V. C.; Rostirolla, F. V.; Trommer, R. M.; Bergmann, C. P. & Samuel, S. M. - Int Endod J., 45, p.63 (2012). PMid:21899568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-2591.2011.01948.x
7. Ghatak, S. K.; Dey, D.; Sen, S. & Sen, K. - Analyst, 138, p.2308 (2013). PMid:23446647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ c3an36842d
8. Collares, F. M.; Ogliari, F. A.; Lima, G. S.; Fontanella, V. R.; Piva, E. & Samuel, S. M. - Int Endod J., 43, p.792 (2010). PMid:20579134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2591.2010.01746.x
9. Savioli, R. N.; Pecora, J. D.; Mian, H. & Ito, I. Y. - Braz. Oral Res., 20, p.127 (2006). PMid:16878205. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S1806-83242006000200007
10. Lee, K. W.; Williams, M. C.; Camps, J. J. & Pashley, D. H. - J. Endod., 28, p.684 (2002). PMid:12398164. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200210000-00002
11. International Organization for Standardization. - “ISO 6876: Dental Root Canal Sealing Materials”, 2nd ed., ISO (2001).
12. International Organization for Standardization. - “ISO 4049: Dentistry – Polymer-based restorative materials”, 4th ed., ISO (2009).
13. International Organization for Standardization. - “ISO 10993-5: Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity”, 3rd ed., ISO.
14. Schwartz, R. S. - J. Endod., 32, p.1125 (2006). PMid:17174666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.08.003
15. Nawal, R. R.; Parande, M.; Sehgal, R.; Naik, A. & Rao, N.R. - Int. Endod. J., 44, p.307 (2011). PMid:21219358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01829.x
16. Sjogren, U.; Hagglund, B.; Sundqvist, G. & Wing, K. - J. Endod., 16, p.498 (1990). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099- 2399(07)80180-4
17. Gambarini, G.; Testarelli, L.; Pongione, G.; Gerosa, R. & Gagliani, M. - Aust. Endod. J., 32, p.31 (2006). PMid:16603043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747- 4477.2006.00005.x
18. Hosoya, M.; Kurayama, H.; Iino, F. & Arai, T. - Int. Endod. J., 37, p.178 (2004). PMid:15009407. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00781.x
19. McMichen, F. R.; Pearson, G.; Rahbaran, S.; & Gulabivala, K. - Int. Endod. J., 36, p.629 (2003). PMid:12950578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00701.x
20. Ferracane, J. L. - Dent. Mater., 22, p.211 (2006). PMid:16087225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. dental.2005.05.005
21. Versiani, M. A.; Carvalho-Junior, J. R.; Padilha, M. I. A. F.; Lacey, S.; Pascon, E. A. & Souza-Neto, M. D. - Int. Endod. J., 39, p.464 (2006). PMid:16674741. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01105.x
22. Garcia, F. G.; Leyva, M. E. & De Queiroz, A. A. A. - Polímeros, 21, p.253 (2011).
23. Brazel, C. S. & Peppas, N. A. - Biomaterials, 20, p.721 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00215-4
24. Juchem, C. O.; Leitune, V. C. B; Collares, F. M.; Samuel, S. M. W. - Polímeros, 21, p.103 (2011). http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S0104-14282011005000031
25. Loushine, B. A.; Bryan, T. E.; Looney, S. W.; Gillen, B. M.; Loushine, R. J.; Weller, R. N.; Pashley, D. H. & Tay, F. R. - J. Endod., 37, p.673 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. joen.2011.01.003
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email